Creamware Luna 2 Windows 7 Driver
Here is a trick for having working Sonic Core Palttform audiocards together with Wavelab 7. I found it in planetz forums but (strange) no mention here. The problem is with Sonic Core Asio drivers(only happens with wavelab).
The first time wavalabs opens it scans all Asio drivers in your computer. Asio From sonic core make it crash so it never opens. But Wavelab is able to work with Sonic core Wave drivers.
So you should do:.- uninstall wavelab..- Go to Program files/Scope PCI/App/Binn.- Close Sonic core plattform. Copy all the Asio dll (my machimne has 4) and paste any other place(after doing the trick you will need to paste in this original directory).
Aug 29, 2011. It works I can play and record audio in wavelab with the wave drivers (mme) from scope. Thanks for the tips. Cubase 9.0.30 64bits- Windows 8.1 pro 64bits - wavelab element 9.5 - core i7 920 - 18 Go RAM - 250 Go SSD + 32 Go SSD + 4.750 To HDD. Creamware/Sonic Core Luna + Pulsar II. Pro Tools 12.8. I have the original Pulsar (not Pulsar 2), that has 4DSPs, I think I bought it 1998 and costed like 1500eur or something. Sonic Core is now the owners of the SCOPE Platform and they have created Windows 7 32bit/64bit drivers for all the old cards aswell as Modular 4 and other new plugins so the cards.
Reopen the sonic core plattform..- Open Wavelab.- Go to options----Audio and change the driver for one of your Sonic core Wave. Close Wavelab.-Close Sonic Core..- Paste the Asio dll in their original directory..- Reopen wavelab and NEVER change the audio options in wavelab to the Asio Sonic Core driver(your computer will freeze and you´ll need to start again with this procedure). It works fine with me.Nice Wavelab. Wonderful Sonic Core. (hopes an update solves this tough.) Regards. Babaorum wrote: the recording is a nightmare of noises. That doesn't work.
Is it the same for you? Are you trying to record in wavelab? Driver 8 In 1 Card Reader Go-c81la. It doesn't work here, I think only ASIO scope drivers will be ok if there is a patch to correct wavelab. Yes, you´re right here recording don´t work.anyway i can use wavelab as i don´t use it to record. Better than nothing.
Hope soon problem will be solved. I maybe can help Steinberg here. Its a lot of misinformation on internet.
Wavelab 6 is working perfect for us both with our old Sonic Core scope PCI. Wavelab 7 is at least loading there in Vista. In our W7 32 we have one new Sonic Core Scope Xite. There we cant even Load Wavelab 7. The same for Wavelab 7 with Xite in our W7 64. Then we use Xite in W7 32 and Wavelab 7 in W7 64 while we wait for Wavelab 7 to be updated for Xite.
When we now are talking about update. We have now tested Wavelab 7 in W7 64 then. We have to use Wavelab 6 in W7 64 also because Waves L316 is not appearing in Wavelab 7. Also what someone here assumed that the built in playback and recording function at the same time, thats only working with using Wave Sourse in Sonic Core Scope ( not working with ASIO ). Thats working very good and good Quality in our VISTA with the old PCI based Sonic Core Scope. Wavelab 6 works also perfect in W7 64 with this function without the new XiteSonic Core there.
The quality using RME MADI Wave Sourse there with Wavelab 6 is just great. Using Wavelab 7 for that in Vista 32 with Scope is loading but when opening the recorder, there is a lot of cricks and cracks as well as in W7 64 using Wave Source. If you use Wavelab 7 with Asio Source at the same time with Wavelab 6 though recording from Wave Source. That works in Vista with Scope and also in W7 64 if you dont use the new Xite Scope. I say Wave Sourse is very good quality using Wavelab 6 and the recording function in Wavelab 7 is not working anywhere for us. The playback Asio from Wavelab 7 is working for us though if we dont use Sonic Core Xite. As far as I can understand Wavelab 7 needs a lot of updates, not only for Sonic Core Scope.
For the use of Wavelab 6 and 7 with two computers W7 32 and W7 64 it work with both, using Sonic Core in the other computer, but then Wavelab 7 is giving Cricks and Cracks. Wavelab 6 is working perfect,but the new Xite Sonic Core Scope, is not working with Wavelab 6 either in the same computer. Maybe we can have our money back or maybe soon Wavelab 7 will work in W7 32 with Xite, and with also the L316 from Waves.
Maybe the cricks and crack will go away when used in other computers without Scope, but thats only when wanting to do playback and recording at the same time with Wave Sourse Otherwise Wavelab 7 will be great I think used In Xite Sonic Core Scope, we just wait and see.
1 stereo in 6.35 1 stereo out 6.35 1 midi in, midi out 1 3 Sharc DSP UTILIZATION Following an old technology as hardware, or we adapt to quality equipment turn or you move on. Always compatible pci port for cheap is fine. GETTING STARTED Even then it was not easy, for this price you do not expect to have to be handy to use their software, today it's different it gets the opportunity to have quality converters. OVERALL OPINION In another age, associated with a PC then you can enjoy a good resource of synths, effects and good quality converters. I wanted something compatible. With a good sampling.
I have a dual core. 4GB ram, not fully usable in windows xp 32. Logic audio platinum 5.
UTILIZATION Latency depends on the recording frequency. The higher the frequency, the higher the latency, the lower this requires CPU resources. I do not worry at this level. The updates are paying, finally, version 4 (xp) to version 5 (for seven). I thought dsp offer more, but ultimately I do not use them.
In addition, the digital format is stereo mini jack is any nawak. GETTING STARTED steinberg problem with the products, it crashes. The update to the new driver costs more than € 200 I think. This is why I still use xp. And for this reason I would not buy this brand more.
OVERALL OPINION I've had about 6 years. I like the wiring via the software. Configuration quickly changed. With experience, no, I would choose something else. I was advised by a seller. At the time of my purchase the DSP were more with less powerful PC.
3 DSP la luna can be used with several bus I / O without pb but little effect and / or synths. [Coupled with Pulsar II for example we go to 9 DSP at all and it's comfortable enough] It must be a PCI (not PCIe standard) for luna. UTILIZATION The converters are very good (comparable to RME according to some forums) Up to version v4.5 of the software / drivers (the sfp scope) you can use it on XP, since v5.1 (full version if you have an older version) it can be used on Windows 7 (32 and 64). The use is difficult because one must take the time to understand the use so the possibilities are flexible. It can route inputs and outputs as you want and place effects, mixer and synths. 4ms latency is possible on my PC (version 5.1 - Core i7 ASUS P6T Deluxe - 6 GB Ram -.5.3).
Core Sonic generation has left a card XITE XITE 1D and much more powerful and PCIe (so very 'up-to-date'!) against the price by not really the same course! When it was immersed in the sonic core card system can rarely move on so it's cool but it takes an investment of time and understanding to begin with. GETTING STARTED There are currently easier to use, USB2 interfaces are legion. On the other hand no equivalent to the software de la luna in terms of routing options it's still huge by just against the limitation 3DSP quickly felt.
We can associate three cards creamware (now sonic core) to increase the power but we DSP motherboard has the correct number of PCI slots. Note XTC mode allows the use of plug-ins cremaware / sonic core in cubase but this mode does not work on a PC in 64-bit system unfortunately. I personally do not use the XTC mode. I would say that this is not a map for beginners. Someone who knows well the audio will love but be careful anyway to install and the PC to be optimum.
OVERALL OPINION This card is good and converters are not pale even today, against its use is difficult (and the install) and PCI are likely to disappear from the next generation of PC. So consider all this. I had a map that would owner with this software since 1996. When I could no longer use this card because it uses a port (ISA obsolete..) I bought the luna of the same brand in the hope it can continue to use my software with which I had done everything for almost 10 years. It always runs on a Pentium 4, with live sound forge cubase etc.
But it is a PCI card, not PCI Express, it has no future. UTILIZATION Drivers stable when we managed to install it. No update for a long time.
It only runs on XP. No latency, it works. GETTING STARTED Installation super long and painful.
Config General laborious. It's long to capture the philosophy Creamware. I have never been able to use the plugs and XTC I bec a lot of people bought this card for that (Not me). These plugs have never worked with my Sony Steinberg and softs. Never figured out how to do despite intensive research over several years. Forget the manual. There's only forums you can pick this stuff abstruse.
OVERALL OPINION 7. ESI PRSESONUS, RME. The Creamware has a good sound very hot and almost tending towards the lamp.
But it too crashed, I took too long to be able to do even a record two tracks with their incredibly twisted patch. Value for money, that time and now it could go for 80 euros, can be worth the shot if we are not afraid of galleys and we do not think to change your PC (PCI slot because often or y'en not today). It runs on an Athlon 3000+ 512MB, no problem.
USE Installation is a bit heavy, go all the codes, it's a little c. At least ten. And if we forget we start a instal.
The creamware system is not affordable to the surface, especially in the older versions with 4 heuresement the direct sound on, before cabler was all about the app. IMPLEMENTATION Drivers very stable, still in beta at creamware kind?? But hey it says it works well, it works in Nuendo 2, no problem. NOTICE GLOBAL I bought this card there are now 5 years old, then I hesitated between a adda2000 and creamware, a sound technician had me rather enlightened on this card that had just come out, and I do not regret my purchase today. What characteristics have motivated your choice? The possibility of DSP and routing - For what purpose? Home studio -What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard.)?
Amd athlon 64 3400 1024 dd ram sata all under Win XP Pro UTILIZATION The installation is done without problem under 3.1 as under the scope 4. Not yet tested the 4.5.
Not need the manual to tell the truth! GETTING STARTED No crash for drivers to date with just over two years of service. Just a pity that so far no drivers for xp 64 ki permit full use of the process. Very good latency mm large project audio tracks as virtual instruments. OVERALL OPINION I spend a little over 1 year xtc mode only with cubase ki allows me to not have two mixers to be able to manage and Integrative plug directly into Cubase. Easy to manage its inputs as outputs of externality with cubase and luna box (8 inputs 8 outputs). In short sound quality not crash.
So far no problem on the other hand delighted to have made that choice just what k'il dsp is sufficient given the opportunity of being pc g abandoned the pulsar. I wanted a simple and powerful card Between Stereo / Stereo output (Anloga and digital) Between Mid Output Ultra-low latency Until the 's nickel, I'm running Cubase, Reason, Acid and even!
I have changed 3 times in conf PII, PIII and PIV surprise. (thank you mr Intel) In the long run I think Creamw @ re abuse by delivering a few drivers 'BETA' for WinXP. For non-computer it mean 'it works to your own risk' and if you push more legislation as it means in the clear 'we are not responsbla bugs'. That is medium like atmosphere. J 'uses only VST plug-ins so the DSP does not serve me absolutely nothing. It is only when marketing and platform to their scope (for a fee, eh?), Who wants to reinvent the synthesizer today? That said, it works well, it Bugge not!
12/20 then that is good enough por price and reliability. UTILIZATION The installation goes well, I did it three times, the connection is limited, however: 6.35 Stereo Jack blah blah! S-VHS for MIDI s'arache ca trp a little easier taking SPDif is buggy, you have to patch it and then this card that makes the 96kHz to 48kHz with SPDIF Why this? The manual on CDROM, that is Deguelle, I like it, I have all imprimbr />The patch is incompreenssible routing to beginners, but when we practice the card for 5 years it makes sense (sic!) GETTING STARTED The card is stable but the drivers are rarely updated.
Creamw@re.de site is silent as the grave. The mixer is a bit c ** ille break, not very accurate in volume and panning in trp Plugins' compress and EQ 'are provided gratos nazes, so why sell DSP if not provided with the plugins that von. Elementary, my dear you have to buy! A 400 card we will buy a 150 plugins?? Nor is it going!
Latency is fine but when you load with cubase, it quickly becomes the mess! I'm just the stereo with this card! OVERALL OPINION I am the User for 5 years my faith, it is like an old couple, a little bitter but I now pass the good times go I don 't want to. The thing that fills me that is that he is opening the platform before opening Cubase or Reason, it takes a chaque3 was 4 minutes, a long ca pette the c ** illes Before I had an ISIS.
's on it' was better. Now I'm eyeing on the MOTU MKII or an ECHO or a RME. No I 'not redeem a second ca is a good OCCAZ to 150 I am here to tell you I 'm going. 50 Cent Major Distribution Download 320kbps there. The strength that made me choose this card is a modular software environment compltement DSP and its well in the end, very little that interests me are developed for.
Also, the quality of the converter, while passing by an Apogee Rosetta now, there is a diffrence but not standard. My config Win XP Pro ASUS P4P800 P4 3.3 GHz 1 GB DDR400 MAXTOR Dique drive etc. UTILIZATION Installation without any problem, the system is super stable, no incompatibility with Logic audio, ultra-low latency (6 ms) The configuration is a little work on his head, but the module system of the virtual environment (wiring, IN / OUT etc.) is so well thought that when you know where you go, and that 'on the ide prcise well on our needs and their solutions, there is no problem its rolls. A guy lost to the routing of its Luna 2 a one man lost in the wiring of the Studio. Not need the manual. GETTING STARTED Using TOP! Trs low latency, Creamware site is in English but damn.
LOGIC AUDIO ASIO at the same time as WAVELAB wave driver with a driver and SOUND FORGE with wave 2 and all started simultaneously! It is a true multi card customers.
2 track recording and 60 read simultaneously without prob. OVERALL OPINION Its been 3 years since I have and I love it, the report price is top quality, it would be a remake, I see even a pulsar r'acheterais 2! Sound card with best of the best converters; the same regardless of the MODEL!! UTILIZATION Manual summary is true but there are forums and prvus spcialiss creamware in France and the United States with basic advice is the gteau. GETTING STARTED Perfect stability at home and I'm my 3rd creamware card!
Although sr, when added together (and it is even possible to prvu evolve slowly and following the budget and ambitions), ask the opinion among the 30 000 to creamwariens whether ue motherboard knows grate a PCI with a big traffic (dsp means give many of PCI). On this point, Intel is on top. It works with 3 maps and 30-prs dsp!! OVERALL OPINION I shoot with creamware 3 years. No card offers the flexibility of this card and its software that allows Scope Fusion cbler as we want to enter and leave with your squence, dealing with effects or synths or samplers put creamware.. In short, I have not found better quality sound and ct.
My friends hallucinate when they cost a purity converters. Although it is a sr PRO card and not semi pro, so this is for those who work venlent srieusement crr and wants their studio or home studio.